Close to a month later, I finally read this issue of Rebecca's Transatlantic Post, and I think it's one of your best. By the way, it is a great name, me thinks.
I am most appreciative of the "German Perspective." Hitler's comments in particular. Next would be the comment on voting by emotion's vote and how Domestic Issues are paramount in US citizens' minds. Each comment is a reflection on "home."
The journalistic work you do is the breadcrumb-like trail to a time perceived by many as a better mode of journalism. AKA anchor of CBS newsman Edward R. Morrow. He earnestly worked with the best of intentions to be a reporter, not a commentator. Not that he was so objective as to forget his own personal moral base, but he was also intentional about taking ownership when he recognized that his morals accompanied his objective writings. He took the possibility of being human and perfectly imperfect and risked speaking his thoughts and observations.
Perhaps there are Germans who will read my comment. I believe that is the essence of what drives your motivation to keep doing what you are doing. Understanding our USA's Constitutional underpinnings for choosing who gets to make the final decisions of the moment at hand requires as visceral experience as a country led by Hitler or a country revolting against a Sovereign.
I remain highly optimistic about the outcome of the last election. Many people feared the result, but they represented the extremes of opinions. The Founders provided a strategy to deal with the extremes, the individuals, and the state, which worked in the 2024 election.
The battle cries of the campaigns were meant to capture the emotional responses of each person while in the voting booth. The Constitution was designed to slow decisions down and prevent the damage a pure democracy would face: mob rule. The conflict of the individual vs. group is dealt with at the State level (individual group) and the Federal level ( all of the states group).
By design, the bicameral Congress, the Executive branch, and the Judiciary must go through the Constitutional process for any changes that set or change precedent in Law.
Your reporting accurately describes what Wikipedia published about January 11, 2014. The dilemma it refers to contains the dichotomy of forces acting on November 5th this year.
Close to a month later, I finally read this issue of Rebecca's Transatlantic Post, and I think it's one of your best. By the way, it is a great name, me thinks.
I am most appreciative of the "German Perspective." Hitler's comments in particular. Next would be the comment on voting by emotion's vote and how Domestic Issues are paramount in US citizens' minds. Each comment is a reflection on "home."
The journalistic work you do is the breadcrumb-like trail to a time perceived by many as a better mode of journalism. AKA anchor of CBS newsman Edward R. Morrow. He earnestly worked with the best of intentions to be a reporter, not a commentator. Not that he was so objective as to forget his own personal moral base, but he was also intentional about taking ownership when he recognized that his morals accompanied his objective writings. He took the possibility of being human and perfectly imperfect and risked speaking his thoughts and observations.
Perhaps there are Germans who will read my comment. I believe that is the essence of what drives your motivation to keep doing what you are doing. Understanding our USA's Constitutional underpinnings for choosing who gets to make the final decisions of the moment at hand requires as visceral experience as a country led by Hitler or a country revolting against a Sovereign.
I remain highly optimistic about the outcome of the last election. Many people feared the result, but they represented the extremes of opinions. The Founders provided a strategy to deal with the extremes, the individuals, and the state, which worked in the 2024 election.
The battle cries of the campaigns were meant to capture the emotional responses of each person while in the voting booth. The Constitution was designed to slow decisions down and prevent the damage a pure democracy would face: mob rule. The conflict of the individual vs. group is dealt with at the State level (individual group) and the Federal level ( all of the states group).
By design, the bicameral Congress, the Executive branch, and the Judiciary must go through the Constitutional process for any changes that set or change precedent in Law.
Your reporting accurately describes what Wikipedia published about January 11, 2014. The dilemma it refers to contains the dichotomy of forces acting on November 5th this year.
Thanks so much for sharing your opinion with me / us.